Clendenning v. Crawford & McLaughlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Crim.R. 16 “does not grant discretion to a party to ignore a request of an opposing party until a court orders compliance”
• holding that Crim.R. 16 “does not grant discretion to a party to ignore a request of an opposing party until a court orders compliance”
• observing that the effect of the sanction of excluding Papadelis’s defense witnesses was to deny Papadelis the right to present a defense
• reasoning that exclusion of testimony is a permissible sanction in a criminal case provided the exclusion does not act to completely deny the defendant his constitutional right to present a defense
• “ ‘The overall purpose [of criminal discovery rules] is to produce a fair trial’ ”
• \[t]he purpose of discovery rules is to prevent surprise and the secreting of evidence favorable to one party\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).