Skip to main content

Clemons v. State

Citations

  • 896 A.2d 1059
  • 392 Md. 339
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidence relevant to the admissibility of expert testimony “will usually be collateral to the substantive issues at trial”
  • discussing the various studies released in 2002 that questioned the value of CBLA evidence and recommended further study of the issue
  • describing studies and concluding that “the assumption that an ingot or vat of lead is homogenous as required for [CABL] to be valid is not generally accepted by the scientific community”
  • “If the trial court determines that the test is admissible, on appellate review, this Court must independently apply the Frye-Reed test to the scientific techniques at issue.”
  • issue of admissibility of scientific evidence preserved for appellate review pursuant to Watson when counsel stated grounds prior to voir dire examination of expert witness but did not restate them after examination was concluded
  • “Based on the criticism of the processes and assumptions underlying [CABL], we determine that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony based on [CABL] because of the lack of general acceptance of the process in the scientific community.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.