Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/24/1990
Clemmons v. Fidler
Citations
- 791 P.2d 257
- 58 Wash. App. 32
- 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that landlord cannot be hable for injuries caused by tenant’s vicious dog even if landlord has actual or implied knowledge of dog’s presence on property and vicious tendencies
- holding that landlord cannot be liable for injuries caused by tenant’s vicious dog even if landlord has actual or implied knowledge of dog’s presence on property and vicious tendencies
- dog is analogous to defect on leased premises; landlord’s liability to third parties is no greater than that to tenant himself
- dog is analogous to defect on leased premises; landlord's liability to third parties is no greater than that to tenant himself
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-07· cited 66×
- Frobig v. GordonWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 32×
- Klitzka Ex Rel. Teutonico v. HelliosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-05-17· cited 32×
- Feister v. BosackMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-01-19· cited 24×
- Batra v. ClarkTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-04-24· cited 22×
- Campbell v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-12-18· cited 11×
- Burgi v. East Winds Court, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-01-26· cited 10×
- Shannon Adamson v. Port of BellinghamNinth Circuit· 2018-08-14· cited 7×
- Sedlacek v. Belmonte Properties, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-10-06· cited 6×
- Bishop by and Through Childers v. CarrollCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-03-08· cited 5×
- AMBERWOOD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. v. MatthewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-28· cited 4×
- Solorio v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-03-22· cited 4×
- Schneider v. KumpfOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-29· cited 4×
- Saralegui Blanco v. Gonzalez SandovalWashington Supreme Court· 2021-04-29· cited 3×
- Frobig v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-06-30· cited 2×
- Duk Ki Park v. HoffardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 2×
- Taylor v. Schukei Family Trust Ex Rel. SchukeiWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-02-02· cited 2×
- Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-07· cited 1×
- Dinesh Batra v. Tammie Clark, Ind & as Next Friend of Clarissa v. EwellTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-04-24
- Klitzka v. HelliosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-05-17
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-01-14· cited 147×
- Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court· 1969-07-17· cited 89×
- Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 59×
- Regan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1969-08-14· cited 42×
- Hackler v. HacklerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-06-11· cited 26×
- Charlton v. Day Island Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-09· cited 18×
- Beeler v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-03-08· cited 16×
- Shafer v. BeyersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-06-16· cited 15×
- Fain v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court· 1977-09-14· cited 15×
- Markwood v. McBroomWashington Supreme Court· 1920-03-16· cited 14×
- Harris v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-02-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.