Clemmie Walker v. James May

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[h]owever, as May did not object to the timeliness of the motion, in deference to the supreme court’s holding in Wilburn, we will briefly address the merits.”
• reaching the merits of an appeal “in 6 deference to [Wilburn],” even though “this Court [did] not have jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).