Clements v. Haskovec

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a pattern of family violence in past can support a finding that family violence will likely occur again in the future
• concluding that appellant committed act of family violence by raising his fist and making other threats though he never actually struck a family member
• holding that evidence of a pattern of family violence in past can support a finding that family violence will likely occur again in the future
• noting that there was “no evidence to the contrary because [opponent of protective order] did not offer any contradicting account of events”
• holding respondent’s increasingly violent behavior and past instances of family violence justified trial court’s finding that family violence would likely reoccur
• discussing, on pinpoint page relied on by Cane, evidence and objections raised at hearing and addressing whether appeal was moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).