Clements v. Fleet Finance, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that suit upon a note was not barred for lack of confirmation of a foreclosure sale, where there were “two separate debts evidenced by two separate notes and secured by two separate security deeds”
• concluding that suit upon a note was not barred for lack of confirmation of a foreclosure sale, where there were “two separate debts evidenced by two separate notes and secured by two separate security deeds”
• “two separate debts evidenced by two separate notes and secured by two separate security deeds” did not merge
• “two separate debts evidenced by two separate notes and secured by two separate security deeds” did not merge
• loans not inextricably intertwined where there were two separate debts, secured by two separate deeds, made at different times, to different creditors, for different collateral purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).