Clements v. Brown
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1959
Syllabus
Appellant cannot challenge on appeal the trial court's issuance of a civil stalking protection order when she failed to file objections to the court's adoption of the magistrate's decision as required by Civ.R. 65.1(G). Even if she could challenge it, the trial court did not err in granting the civil stalking protection order after the parties consented in writing to enter it. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- privilege protects statements published by bridge club members about disciplining of one of the members
- “A breach of contract is not a tort unless the law imposes a duty on the relationship created by the contract which exists apart from the contract.”
- “Nor does the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to 8 appellant, show that the board had a reckless disregard for the truth. . . . The minutes state 9 that the board discussed the situation for over an hour.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.