Clemente v. VASLO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• issues “adverted to … in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation,” are deemed waived
• “‘[M]ere speculation, conjecture, or fantasy’ [is] insufficient to survive a motion for summary judgment.” (quoting Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc., 355 F.3d 515, 533 (6th Cir. 2004))
• “‘[M]ere speculation, conjecture, or fantasy’ [is] insufficient to survive a motion for summary judgment.”
• issues raised in a perfunctory manner are deemed waived
• issues raised in a perfunctory manner are deemed waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).