Skip to main content
· 10/28/1959

Clemente v. Greyhound Corporation

Citations

  • 155 A.2d 316
  • 52 Del. 223
  • 1959 Del. Super. LEXIS 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a court may decline jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment action when there are other, more “effective” tools available for resolving the underlying dispute
  • “[T]he principal reason for the invention of the declaratory judgment procedure was to enable the law of a case to be determined before mere differences ripen into actual injuries.”
  • “[T]he principal reason for the invention of the declaratory judgment procedure was to enable the law of a case to be determined before mere differences ripen into actual injuries.”
  • “[T]he principal reason for the invention of the declaratory judgment procedure was to enable the law of a case to be determined before mere differences ripen into actual injuries.”
  • In the discussion of appropriate relief in a declaratory judgment case, the Court stated “generally the relief prayed in the complaint will not control the ultimate relief that may be warranted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stiftel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.