Clemente v. Fahey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements made were nontestimonial because the primary motivation of the declarant was to call for assistance
• statements made to 911 operator held nontestimonial where declarant’s “primary motivation was to call for urgent assistance, and not to phone in an anonymous accusation”
• call featuring 911 operator requesting description properly admitted under the excited-utterance exception to hearsay due to distraught nature of caller

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).