Clement v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• labor expenses of AT&T to repair cut telephone line could not be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The State v. Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-10-09
• Dewayne Motes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-08-22

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sidner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-06-09· cited 42×
• In the Interest of A. F.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-01-20· cited 29×
• Polite v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-05-10· cited 28×
• Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Dendy
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-01-28· cited 24×
• Bryan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-09-23· cited 23×
• Cantrell v. Northeast Georgia Medical Center
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-11-02· cited 19×
• Department of Transportation v. Brand
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-04-04· cited 19×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-08-03· cited 19×
• Nash v. Compass Bank
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-23· cited 18×
• Department of Transportation v. Fitzpatrick
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-09-18· cited 15×
• Waldrop v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-12· cited 14×
• Feagin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-08-30· cited 14×
• In the Interest of J. T.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-05-21· cited 11×
• Waters v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-10-30· cited 7×