Skip to main content
· 5/22/1985

Clemens Graf Droste Zu Vischering v. Kading

Citations

  • 368 N.W.2d 702
  • 1985 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that contractors have constructive notice of all information contained in recorded documents and have a duty of inquiry concerning circumstances disclosed in those records
  • holding that contractors have constructive notice of all information contained in recorded documents and have a duty of inquiry concerning circumstances disclosed in those records
  • holding that contracts between contractors and vendor, entered into after vendor conveyed his interest in the building to vendee, to improve the building to make it ready for use as a restaurant could not provide basis for mechanic’s lien
  • holding that contracts between contractors and vendor, entered into after vendor conveyed his interest in the building to vendee, to improve the building to make it ready for use as a restaurant could not provide basis for mechanic's lien
  • in case involving commercial property, “owner” under mechanic’s lien statute includes both the buyer and seller under an executory contract
  • “[A]n actual agency must exist before [the] principal may be held liable.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Uhlenhopp, Harris, McCormick, Carter, Wolle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.