Clem v. Fairchild

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Hatch- Waxman Amendments balanced “two competing interests in the pharmaceutical industry: (1) inducing pioneering research and development of new drugs[,] and (2) enabling competitors to bring low-cost, generic copies of those drugs to market”
• noting that the relevant question for Chevron Step One is whether a statutory provision “[is]susceptible of multiple plausible interpretations and [is] thus ambiguous, or whether there is only one possible interpretation of this statutory language” (internal citations omitted)
• “[T]he Auer standard provides for an even greater degree of deference to the agency than the standard that Chevron establishes.” (internal quotation marks, citation, and alteration omitted)
• \[T]he Auer standard provides for an even greater degree of deference to the agency than the standard that Chevron establishes.\ (internal quotation marks, citation, and alteration omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).