Cleary Diving Service, Inc. v. Thomas, Head & Greisen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a note asking the court not to dismiss the action was not a sufficient “proceeding”
• holding that a note asking the court not to dismiss the action was not a sufficient \proceeding\
• stating that “in order to prevail on a 60(b) motion, a movant must generally show the existence of a meritorious claim as well as one of the grounds stated in the rule, such as excusable neglect or mistake”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).