Clearvalle, Inc. v. Cohen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that order granting an ore tenus, ex parte motion for default made with no prior notice to any party violated due process
• holding that order granting an ore tenus, ex parte motion for default made with no prior notice to any party violated due process
• holding an ore tenus motion for default did not satisfy the requirement for proof of service of notice of application for default in rule 1.500(b)
• stating that “failure to produce proof of service of the required notice of application for default alone renders the entry of a default judgment erroneous.”
• finding entry of default made on an ore tenus motion by appellee at docket call when appellants were not present error
• a default, imposed as a sanction for failure to appear at docket call, was reversed on the ground that the party did not have notice of the default as required by rule 1.500

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).