Skip to main content
· 4/9/2009

ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Chiang

Citations

  • 608 F. Supp. 2d 1270
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31303
  • 2009 WL 975377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the nature of the misappropriation, that it was “willful and malicious,” supported finding that there was no adequate remedy at law
  • recognizing a “cognizable danger” of future violations supports granting a permanent injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tena Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.