Clear v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to agree with State that jury must have found victim to be entirely credible would be to step into jury's place and would violate defendant’s right to a unanimous jury verdict of guilt
• concluding error in the charge was egregious because it deprived the defe ndant of his right to a unanimous verdict
• egregious harm when prosecutor said four jurors could believe one act occurred while four others could believe a different act occurred
• “In this case evidence was presented with respect to each of the offenses that was charged in the disjunctive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).