Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that \[h]ealth care plans are mandatory subjects of bargaining\ under the NLRA, and holding that a company's unilateral, material changes to health care benefits violates the Act
• \employer activity aimed at causing disaffection from the union\ cannot provide basis for showing of lack of majority support for union
• “employer activity aimed at causing disaffection from the union” cannot provide basis for showing of lack of majority support for union
• an employer who believes that a Union has lost majority support may petition the NLRB for decertification but may not in the interim refuse to bargain or otherwise engage in unfair labor practices
• preserving existing arrangement for implementing health and welfare plan
• preserving existing arrangement for implementing health and welfare plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).