Skip to main content
· 8/1/2017

Clear Creek Independent School District v. Cotton Commerical USA, Inc. F/K/A Cottonwood Debris Company, LLC

Citations

  • 529 S.W.3d 569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the juxtaposition of conflicting case precedent about whether particular eligibility determinations provide objective criteria
  • noting some tension in our case law on this point and concluding we lack jurisdiction to review a petitioner's eligibility for a different form of discretionary relief
  • “It is evident without question that the statute leaves final determination on whether to grant timeliness waivers . . . to the Attorney General’s discretion and so places those deci- sions beyond our review.”
  • “we tend to agree with SRI that the human mind is not 19 equipped to detect suspicious activity by using network monitors and analyzing network 20 packets as recited by the claims.”
  • “Section 285 permits a prevailing party to recover reasonable 22 attorneys’ fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyce, Busby, Jewell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.