Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Town Board of Windham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hile aesthetics and traffic safety are regularly found to be substantial enough government interests to support a content-neutral regulation, those interests are rarely compelling enough to support a content-based regulation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).