Clean Giant, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that evidence that interstate and foreign commerce is in some way affected by the state law is insufficient to meet plaintiff s burden in showing violation of Commerce Clause
• stating that Daimler’s rationale 21 also governs in the specific jurisdiction context
• looking to New York law and treatises for guidance to 21 establish the meaning of a term in an Arizona standard fire policy
• requiring official be subjectively aware of serious medical 21 need and fail to adequately respond to need to establish deliberate indifference
• “An import ban that simply effectuates a complete ban on commerce in certain items is not discriminatory, as long as the ban on commerce does not make distinctions based on the origin of the items.”
• “protection of wildlife is one of the state’s most important interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).