C.L.D. v. Wall-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding intrusion upon seclusion inapplicable where “plaintiff voluntarily disclosed her medical circumstances to [defendant] and cannot claim that he obtained the information by intrusive means.”
• disclosure to three people is not sufficient publicity to warrant a claim for invasion of privacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).