Skip to main content
· 6/5/1978

Clayton v. Penn Central Transportation Co.

Citations

  • 376 N.E.2d 524
  • 176 Ind. App. 544
  • 1978 Ind. App. LEXIS 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing a grant of summary judgment where genuine issues of fact existed, including “the capacity of [the child] to understand the danger presented by the slow-moving train [and] the extent to which the railroad knew of the children’s activities near and on the trains”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.