Clayton v. Ohio Bd. of Nursing (Slip Opinion)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that statutory ambiguity is a prerequisite to a determination that an officer’s mistake of law was objectively reasonable
• holding that the government forfeited an argument against suppression by failing to make it in the district court
• concluding that statutory ambiguity is a prerequisite to a determination that an officer’s mistake of law was objectively reasonable
• concluding that statutory 14 ambiguity is a prerequisite to a determination that an officerʹs mistake of law 11 Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 14 15‐3776‐cr United States v. Diaz 1 was objectively reasonable
• noting statute in case unambiguous \and Heien does not support the proposition that a police officer acts in an objectively reasonable manner by misinterpreting an unambiguous statute.\ (emphasis in original)
• “Heien does not support the proposition that a police officer acts in an objectively reasonable manner by misinterpreting an unambiguous statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).