Clayton v. Luebbers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding petitioner’s claim defaulted under Rule 302(a); Peterson v. Brennan, 196 F. App’x 135, 142 (3d Cir. 2006) (finding that the PCRA statute of limitations is an adequate and independent state ground to deny habeas relief
• finding petitioner's claim defaulted under Rule 302(a); Peterson v. Brennan, 196 F. App’x 135, 142 (3d Cir. 2006) (finding that the PCRA statute of limitations is an adequate and independent state ground to deny habeas relief
• finding petitioner's claim defaulted under Rule 302(a); Peterson v. Brennan, 196 F. App’x 135, 142 (3d Cir. 2006) (finding that the PCRA statute of limitations is an adequate and independent state ground to deny habeas relief
• finding petitioner’s claim defaulted under Rule 302(a); Oliver v. Eckard, Civ. No. 16- 677, 2018 WL 7502404, at (E.D. Pa. June 26, 2018) (R&R approved and adopted Feb. 28, 2019, 2019 WL 1003599) (finding Rule 302(a
• “When a state law bars a [habeas] petitioner from seeking further review of his claims in state court, the claims are procedurally defaulted.”
• finding petitioner's claim defaulted under Rule 302(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).