Clayton v. Jensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the presumption may be rebutted “by a showing of express permission and perhaps by other excusatory facts”
• stating that an easement established for benefit of a particular tract of land is an “appurtenant right” that passes with ownership of the benefited tract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).