Clayton v. Clayton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly disregarded an agreement that would have conveyed marital assets in contemplation of divorce in return for little or no consideration
• stating that the family court had a duty to consider the bona fides of husband's post-separation transfer of assets in assessing the value of all property interests of each party under 15 V.S.A. § 751(b)(6
• stating that the family court had a duty to consider the bona fides of husband’s post-separation transfer of assets in assessing the value of all property interests of each party under 15 V.S.A. § 751(b)(6
• stating that family court had a duty to consider bona fides of husband’s post-separation transfer of assets in assessing value of all property interests of each party under 15 V.S.A. § 751(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).