Skip to main content
· 3/1/1956

Clayton v. Aluma-Lock Corp.

Citations

  • 207 Or. 175
  • 294 P.2d 333
  • 1956 Ore. LEXIS 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cannot add party by amendment after statute of limitations had run where its existence and legal status remained unchanged and was known to plaintiff at time original suit was filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brand, Lusk, Perry, Tooze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.