Skip to main content
· 4/11/2024

Clayton Sugg Wilson, Jr. v. Rebecca Lynn Blocker Wilson

Syllabus

This appeal concerns the award of attorney's fees in a post-divorce dispute. Clayton Sugg Wilson, Jr. (\Father\) and Rebecca Lynn Blocker Huston (\Mother\) were divorced in 2017, at which time Mother was named the primary residential parent of the parties' one minor child, and Father was ordered to pay child support as well as one-half of their child's uninsured medical expenses. Four years later, Father filed a petition to modify his child support obligation, claiming that his income had decreased so much that Mother should pay him child support. Mother opposed Father's petition and filed a petition for civil contempt and to enforce the parties' permanent parenting plan, claiming that Father had repeatedly failed to pay his child support obligation and his share of their child's uncovered medical expenses. The trial court found Father in civil contempt and awarded Mother an arrearage judgment. Based on his 2020 income, the court reduced Father's monthly child support obligation. The court awarded Mother her attorney's fees in bringing the contempt action. Father then filed a motion for apportionment of Mother's attorney's fees, which the trial court denied, finding that the fees awarded to Mother were reasonable. Father appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for apportionment of fees. We affirm the trial court in all respects. Finding that Mother is entitled to recover her reasonable and necessary attorney's fees and expenses incurred on appeal under Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-5- 103(c), we remand for a determination and award thereof.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving expert’s reliance on “materials maintained at ATF ‘research libraries,’ which contained information on approximately five thousand different firearms”
  • upholding admission of agent’s expert testimony, based partly on conversations with Smith & Wesson’s historian, that a Smith & Wesson firearm was manufactured in Massachusetts
  • reviewing rulings relating to the admissibility of expert testimony for clear abuses of discretion
  • “[Tjestimony identifying the manufacturer of a firearm will usually constitute technical or specialized knowledge that will assist the trier of fact.”
  • ″Under Rule 702 the only inquiry is whether the expert opinion, taken as a whole, may assist the jury in resolving an ultimate issue of fact … .″
  • \[T]he 'interstate nexus' element was met provided the government demonstrated that [the defendant] possessed the shotgun in a state other than the one in which it was manufactured.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.