Skip to main content
· 4/23/1927

Clayman v. Smithers

Citations

  • 18 F.2d 955
  • 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 2119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “setting the timing of a hearing” is procedural because it does not “implicate[]” the “outcome” of that hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Parker, Rose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.