Claybon J. Edwards v. David T. Sammons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the general rule that abstention is not appropriate \in cases involving such a strong national interest as the right to vote\
• citing, as examples of cases where the Supreme Court referred to the nature of the right involved in upholding a refusal to abstain, Harman, 380 U.S. at 537, 85 S. Ct. at 1183 (voting rights
• abstention held inappropriate “based ... on the imperative of the right to vote”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).