Clay v. Yates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a complaint which merely repeats pending or previously litigated claims may be considered abusive”
• “[The] claims against . . . [the jJudge[-defendant] fall squarely within the definition of legal frivolity . . . because it is clear that [he is] immune from suit.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• complaints that simply repeat pending or previously litigated claims may qualify as abusive
• “[I]t is □ appropriate to consider what the court’s records show about the number and kinds of cases instituted by the pro se litigant, and the extent to which the conduct of that litigant constitutes and an abuse of the judicial process.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).