Skip to main content
· 12/21/1990

Clay v. Faison

Citations

  • 583 A.2d 1388
  • 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 322
  • 1990 WL 211442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing a narrow conception of “on the merits” for claim preclusion purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Steadman, Farrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.