Skip to main content
· 12/6/1915

Clay v. El Dorado Hotel Co.

Citations

  • 121 Ark. 253
  • 180 S.W. 977
  • 1915 Ark. LEXIS 487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • judgment rendered after court trial in plaintiff’s favor on ‘‘mutually exclusive’’ claims for breach of lease and quantum meruit was not reversible error ‘‘because the plaintiff produced sufficient evidence to support the judgment under either count’’
  • judgment rendered after court trial in plaintiffs favor on “mutually exclusive” claims for breach of lease and quantum meruit was not reversible error “because the plaintiff produced sufficient evidence to support the judgment under either count”
  • breach of lease and quantum meruit counts are mutually exclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.