Skip to main content
· 4/16/1985

Clay v. Doherty

Citations

  • 608 F. Supp. 295
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that differing accounts among defendants “could, of course, give rise to real conflicts, but that potential has yet to be realized”
  • denying a motion to disqualify conditioned upon the filing of verified documents “establishing an adequate basis for defendants’ informed consent”
  • “Vague and general inconsistencies of position giving rise to hypothetical conflicts in the mind of an opposing party will not justify so drastic a measure as disqualification”
  • where judge’s acquaintance with key witness did not justify recusal
  • where judge's acquaintance with key witness did not justify recusal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.