Clavir v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]xception (11) to § 552a(b) makes it completely clear that the [Privacy] Act cannot be used to block the normal course of court proceedings, including court-ordered discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paul Laxalt v. C.K. McClatchy
  D.C. Circuit· 1987-01-20· cited 71×
• Fiumara v. Higgins
  D. New Hampshire· 1983-09-30· cited 10×
• Johnson v. Folino
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-12-10· cited 7×
• Ford Motor Co. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1993-06-15