Clauro Enterprises, Inc. v. Aragon Galiano Holdings, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that service was not proper because plaintiff “did not and could not meet its burden of establishing that the only address” for the defendant “discoverable through public records was a private mailbox”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).