CLAUDIO LATTANZIO v. JERIKA HOFFMANN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that challenges to executive orders 4 mandating COVID-19 vaccination were mooted when a subsequent executive order “revoked” the challenged orders
• holding that case including claims for declaratory and injunctive relief was moot after challenged executive orders creating COVID-19 vaccine mandate no longer existed
• explaining that because the vaccine mandate exemption was based on executive orders that no longer exist, no relief is available
• mooting a challenge to Executive Orders 14,042 and 14,043 after the issuance of the Revocation Order
• sovereign immunity “is 26 a threshold jurisdictional issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).