Claudine Robinson v. Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc., an Illinois Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Illinois law and concluding that acceptance and consideration for modification of manual cannot be inferred from employee’s continued work
• where continuing to work merely constituted performance under the original contract, continued work did not show acceptance of or consideration for modification of the contract
• where continuing to work merely constituted performance under the original contract, continued work did not show acceptance of or consideration for modification of the contract
• employer's issuance of a revised employee handbook containing a disclaimer did not have the effect of modifying an original employment contract in the absence of a bargained-for exchange
• Under Illinois law acceptance and consideration \cannot be inferred from [employee's] continued work\; there must be some benefit to employee, detriment to employer, or employee's continued work under new manual must have been bargained-for exchange.
• Under Illinois law acceptance and consideration “cannot be inferred from [employee’s] continued work”; there must be some benefit to employee, detriment to employer, or employee’s continued work under new manual must have been bargained-for exchange.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).