· 1/31/2017
Claudia Joan Hill Renfro v. John Malcolm Renfro
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining whether undisputed evidence of appellant’s conduct constituted a violation of the organized retail theft statute
- “The parties have not briefed this issue in this Court, and we decline to address this question in the first instance.”
- reversing conviction because evidence was legally insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.