Claudia Harbourt v. PPE Casino Resorts Maryland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that termination “for refusing to participate in unlawful or deceptive conduct that directly compromise[s] public safety” violates the public policy of Massachusetts
• noting that “minor instances of employment skirmishes” are not sufficient to form a hostile work environment
• noting that the employer has no duty to divine the need for an accommodation
• treating Chapter 151B's anti-retaliation provision as an \analog\ to the ADA's anti-retaliation provision and analyzing identical elements under both laws
• importing elements from a Title VII hostile work environment claim into the ADA context
• applying ADA retaliation standard to analogous retaliation claims brought under Chapter 151B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).