Claude v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the statutory distinction between hit-and-run and miss-and-run vehicles for purposes of mandatory uninsured motorist coverage did not violate equal protection
• holding the statutory distinction between hit-and-run and miss- and-run vehicles for purposes of mandatory uninsured motorist coverage did not violate equal protection
• stating public policy is determined by reference to the constitution, statutes, and the court’s prior decisions, not by the -court’s generalized view of what is fair or just in a particular case
• making specific reference to lack of briefing on independent state constitutional approach
• making specific reference to lack of briefing on independent state constitutional approach
• making specific reference to lack of briefing on independent state constitutional approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).