Claud Sloan v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for clear error district court’s determination that plaintiff qualified for long-term disability benefits because he lacked work capacity
• affirming the denial of a motion to expand the administrative record to include evidence that was merely duplicative of what was already in the record
• affirming judgment “on the briefs and a stipulated fact record” in an ERISA-benefits case
• affirming judgment “on the briefs and a stipulated fact record” in an ERISA-benefits case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).