Classicberry Limited v. Musicmaker.com, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of defendant’s motion to amend their answer after the cut-off to amend the pleadings
• affirming district court’s denial of defendant’s motion for leave to amend answer to add two counterclaims after plaintiff had filed a motion for summary judgment because there was no justification for the delay and evidence the amendment would prejudice the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frenkel v. New York City Off-Track Betting Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2009-05-04· cited 25×
• New Hampshire Insurance v. Total Tool Supply, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2009-06-02· cited 13×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Grace v. Rosenstock
  Second Circuit· 2000-08-25· cited 198×
• Krumme v. Westpoint Stevens Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1998-05-01· cited 115×
• Venezia v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
  Supreme Court· 2001-03-19· cited 9×
• Grace v. Genser
  Supreme Court· 2001-03-19· cited 3×