Classic Comfort Heating & Supply, L.L.C. v. Miller
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 855
Syllabus
Appellant's invoices to appellee were due and payable when presented, and the trial court erred in failing to determine the accrual date of the invoices and the appropriate interest rate for prejudgment interest. Appellant's motion for attorney's fees, costs, and expenses in defending appellee's counterclaims for breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, and Consumer Sales Practices Act violations demonstrated arguable merit, and the court abused its discretion in denying the motion without a hearing. Judgments reversed and remanded.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- commenting that “[a]n organization may not assert a preemptive and exclusive representation by the organization’s lawyer of all current (or former) employees as a means to insulate them all from ex parte communication with the lawyers of potentially adverse parties”
- attorney may not appear for another without that person’s consent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.