Clary v. Clary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remand for consideration of a written statement is inappropriate where party has not established prima facie compliance with Rule 5A:8(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-06-15· cited 19×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Turner v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-03-18· cited 300×
• Anderson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-01-14· cited 128×
• Mayhood v. Mayhood
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-07-07· cited 29×
• Proctor v. Town of Colonial Beach
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-01-19· cited 19×