Clarke v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an affirmance without a written opinion does not reveal whether the reviewing court did not find fundamental error
• distinguishing Chandler because the Court had affirmed the direct appeal without a written opinion and therefore did not reveal whether it had found that no fundamental error occurred
• distinguishing Chandler because the Court had affirmed the direct appeal without a written opinion and therefore did not reveal whether it had found that no fundamental error occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tavares J. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-03-16· cited 9×
• Furney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-26· cited 5×
• State v. Anthony M. Jackson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-10· cited 1×
• Tavares J. Wright v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-11-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bruno v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-06· cited 103×
• Chandler v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-17· cited 43×
• Lowe v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-11-06· cited 41×
• BAYSON v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-11· cited 2×