Clarke v. SAIF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prescription of a leg brace that would only improve claimant’s functional abilities did not establish that he was not medically stationary
• issue involving a dispute over the date the claimant became medically stationary.
• issue involving a dispute over the date the claimant became medically stationary.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Logsdon v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-08· cited 10×
• Saif Corp. v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 9×
• LuAnn Shubert v. Macy's West, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2015-02-27· cited 8×
• McGee v. JD LUMBER
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2000-12-22· cited 7×
• Skyline/Homette Corp. v. Boling
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-06-19

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Nordstrom, Inc. v. Gaul
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-07-24· cited 4×