Clarke v. Max Advisors, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is . . . well established that questions concerning a party’s intent ordinarily present issues of 25 fact.” (citing Kahuna Group, Inc. v. Scarano Boat Building, Inc., 984 F.Supp. 109, 114–15 (N.D.N.Y. 1997
• granting post-discovery summary judgment that agreement was not unconscionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).