Clark v. Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing evidence in aggravation that the accused had altered test scores other than those for which he was convicted
• stating “the continuous nature of the charged conduct and its full impact on the military community are proper aggravating circumstances”
• finding evidence that the appellant had altered test scores on occasions other than those for which he was convicted was admissible to show the “continuous nature of the charged conduct and its full impact on the military community”
• permissible to show that appellant altered 20-30 enlistment aptitude tests, even though he pleaded guilty only to altering 4
• permissible to show that appellant altered twenty to thirty enlistment aptitude tests, even though he pleaded guilty to only altering four
• evidence that accused altered test scores on occasions other than those for which he was convicted admissible to show “continuous nature of the charged conduct and its full impact on the military community”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).